Re[13]: Warning: Got signal 14 from thread X

[BAUMEISTER Alexandre]

Bonjour Michael,

BAUMEISTER>> Sinisa,
BAUMEISTER>>   This time I compiled with :

BAUMEISTER>>   CFLAGS=-DSOLARIS CXXFLAGS="-DSOLARIS -felide-constructors
> -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti" ./configure
BAUMEISTER>> --prefix=/usr/local/mysql --without-bench --enable-thread-safe-client
> --with-innobase --without-debug
BAUMEISTER>> --with-named-thread-libs=-lthread --without-berkeley-db --without-raid
> --without-mit-threads
BAUMEISTER>>                           ^^^^^^^


BAUMEISTER>>   "mysqlbug" still gives me strange things :

BAUMEISTER>> Configure command:
BAUMEISTER>> ./configure  --with-unix-socket-path=/var/tmp/mysql.sock
> --with-low-memory --with-mit-threads=yes
BAUMEISTER>>  --without-perl --enable-thread-safe-client --with-berkeley-db
> --with-innobase

MW> Did you do a 'make clean' in the between ?

MW> Note that if the compile failed or you didn't do 'make clean' mysqlbug
MW> is not generated with your new command line.

  No  I  did not do "make clean". I didn't knew that I had to in order
  to update mysqlbug.

  As  I  was  each  time  configuring and building from a fresh tar, I
  though  that  mysqlbug  was updated after I do configure, make, make
  install.

BAUMEISTER>>    And I still have "Warning" messages BUT a lot less !

BAUMEISTER>> 010321 19:25:01  mysqld started
BAUMEISTER>> Innobase: Started
BAUMEISTER>> /usr/local/mysql/libexec/mysqld: ready for connections
BAUMEISTER>> 010321 19:25:24  Warning: Got signal 14 from thread 10

MW> <cut>

MW> Have you applied the patches for Solaris 2.8 ?
MW> We have all the suggested patches on our Solaris 2.8 machine and we
MW> don't have the above problem!

  No  I didn't. We are currently applying the last patches. I will let
  you know if it corrects everything.


BAUMEISTER>>   In  fact,  Mysql  writes  this  message  only  and  each time I do a
BAUMEISTER>>   "mysqladmin status" or "mysqladmin processlist" or "mysqladmin ping"
BAUMEISTER>>   !!!

MW> Can you try if our Solaris 2.7 binary works for you?
MW> (This should work on Solaris 2.8 without any problems!)

  I tried 2.7 binary and there was no problem.

  I'll let you know about the Solaris 2.8 patches.

  Regards,
  Alex.