List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Matthias Pigulla Date:March 20 1999 10:40am
Subject:Re: RAID levels
View as plain text  
Kyle Cordes wrote:
> that you need more drives for the same amount of net storage.  0+1 is
> also more reliable in the sense that more than one drive can fail
> (as long as they are not a mirrored pair) without losing data or
> uptime.

Wrong. With RAID 0+1, you can only lose one drive - the striped set will
become corrupt and you have the mirror stripe set left.

With RAID 1+0, which is striping over mirrored sets, you can still carry
on as long as one mirror disk of each stripe part is alive.

Matthias
-- 
   w e b f a c t o r y | matthias pigulla
      www.webfactory.de  mp@stripped
Thread
SV: fastCPU vs moreRAMMartin Edelius19 Mar
  • RAID levelsKyle Cordes20 Mar
    • Re: RAID levelsMatthias Pigulla20 Mar
  • Re: PLEASE READ: Porting Windows VC++ MySQL Proggie to Linux\UnixSinisa Milivojevic27 Jun
Re: SV: fastCPU vs moreRAMDerick H Siddoway19 Mar