| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | July 7 1999 5:15pm |
| Subject: | Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 1:54 AM +1000 7/8/1999, Richard McLean wrote: >>Actually PC Labs conducted another test, with people from Redhat doing all >>the tweaking they wanted. Result? Linux still got stomped. > > >They also worked out why and it's being fixed for one of the next kernels. >Try and get Microsoft to do this (for free). What? If you give Microsoft the chance to tweak a benchmark, they won't do it? -- Paul DuBois, paul@stripped Northern League Chronicles: http://www.snake.net/nl/
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | matthew mcglynn | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Patrick Greenwell | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | jonathan michaels | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | CacoDem0n | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Orlando Andico | 7 Jul |
| • Select statement for the following... | Matt Duggan | 7 Jul |
| • Re: Select statement for the following... | Martin Ramsch | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Orlando Andico | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Greg Patterson | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Patrick Greenwell | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Junster | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | (Chris Adams) | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Orlando Andico | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | mab | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Orlando Andico | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Richard McLean | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Orlando Andico | 7 Jul |
| • Re: ram: 1 gig or 2 ? | Paul DuBois | 7 Jul |
