| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Karl Pielorz | Date: | March 19 1999 4:29pm |
| Subject: | Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Derick H Siddoway wrote: > As an extreme case, a couple of years ago I ran some informal > tests on a 386sx with 128MB of RAM versus a pentium200 with 8MB > of RAM, and the 386 won almost every time. You sure that was a 386sx? - They only had 24 bit address busses = 2^24 = 16Mb of RAM max... :-( I still agree though - with most Databases more RAM = better... Most O/S's (and even Mysql) provide performance monitors for watching what the machines processes are doing (i.e. excessive swapping, disk access etc.) -Karl
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • fastCPU vs moreRAM | Scott Moseman | 18 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Wade Maxfield | 18 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Sasha Pachev | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Hironori Sato | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Karl Pielorz | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Wade Maxfield | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Adrian Phillips | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
