| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Scott Moseman | Date: | March 18 1999 10:51pm |
| Subject: | fastCPU vs moreRAM | ||
| View as plain text | |||
A partner and myself are going to be building a box to start our web dev and hosting side business. We're going to be running Linux with Apache and MySQL (with Perl as the interface). Should be pretty low load at first, but we want to let the machine be as expandable as possible. My question is for the intial build, should we focus more on faster CPU's or on more RAM? I'm curious as to which would be a better performer. I know it's good to have plenty of both *grin* but we (of course) have a limited budget initially and would like to know which route is better to start up with. Thanks for any advice, -- Scott Moseman Got Linux? scottm@stripped scotech.com
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • fastCPU vs moreRAM | Scott Moseman | 18 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Wade Maxfield | 18 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Sasha Pachev | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Hironori Sato | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Karl Pielorz | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Wade Maxfield | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Adrian Phillips | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
| • Re: fastCPU vs moreRAM | Derick H Siddoway | 19 Mar |
