| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Ritschie | Date: | May 27 1999 9:09am |
| Subject: | Re: Web application benchmark results | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi, > > > Again this is all about getting started. Just "Hello, > > > world", that's it. Obviously the results will change > > > quite a bit on a more complex program. I will probably > > > do more tests tomorrow and publish the results. If any > > > body has any suggestions/requests, let me know. > Remember, this is just "Hello, world", who can get to the starting line > the fastest type of comparison. Many web applications spend majority of > the response time just getting to the start, and for those this test > indicates that PHP is probably the best solution. However, if there is > any kind of race beyond the starting line, things will change quite a > bit. That is why I am mouch interedsted in more complex tests, Please let me know if you have made a more complex test! It is obvious that if the example was more complex the result would have changed a lot. Ritschie
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Web application benchmark results | Sasha Pachev | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Van | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Dave | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | SrfRoG | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Sasha Pachev | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Ritschie | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Davor Cengija | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Vivek Khera | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Ritschie | 28 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Sasha Pachev | 28 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Sasha Pachev | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | mab | 27 May |
| • Re: Web application benchmark results | Sasha Pachev | 27 May |
