List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:SrfRoG Date:May 27 1999 5:30am
Subject:Re: Web application benchmark results
View as plain text  
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Dave wrote:

> > > I finally got around to installing PHP on our web
> > > server, and to celebrate the event, I decided to run a
> > > simple benchmark to compare CGI's in C, C++, Perl and
> > > SSI, PHP, and raw HTML. I must admit that the benchmark
> > > was greatly skewed to favor server parsed languages. The
> > > measurement in question was the response time for a
> > > request that would send the following HTML:
> > > 
> > > <html><body>Hello,world</body></html>
> > > 
> > > So really the test was about how it it takes to get
> > > started, since the amount of time it takes to send the
> > > result over 10MB Ethernet is less than 1ms. So here are
> > > the results (Linux 2.0.29, Pentium II 233, 64 MB RAM, UW
> > > SCSI, Apache 1.3.6 with PHP 3.0.7):
> > > 

[snipet removed]

you forgot to add mod_perl/ePerl to the list ;)
also, mod_ecgi and mod_cgisock. they all fit your
criteria and always worth a look.

http://apache.perl.org
http://modules.apache.org

just my $0.02.

Thread
Web application benchmark resultsSasha Pachev27 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsVan27 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsDave27 May
    • Re: Web application benchmark resultsSrfRoG27 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsSasha Pachev27 May
    • Re: Web application benchmark resultsRitschie27 May
      • Re: Web application benchmark resultsDavor Cengija27 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsVivek Khera27 May
    • Re: Web application benchmark resultsRitschie28 May
      • Re: Web application benchmark resultsSasha Pachev28 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsSasha Pachev27 May
Re: Web application benchmark resultsmab27 May
  • Re: Web application benchmark resultsSasha Pachev27 May