Salut,
Hope there will result an improvement of Mysql.
Alex.
>>
>> >Can you, or anyone else from TcX, comment more constructively on the
>> >last two paragraphs of my previous message?
>>
>> I don't know what the answer is, because I don't know that code
>> well enough. It seems like the server should be able to copy from
>> a temporary results table to the client and unlock the tables used
>> in the query. It would be nice to be able to force this to happen,
>> either in the SQL statement or with a connection flag (or both).
>>
>> >Also, Alexandre has just observed that the problem does not appear to
>> >be resolved by adding an ORDER BY. That doesn't match your explanation
>> >of the cause of the problem.
>> >
>> >I believe that there is a serious concurrency issue here that needs
>> >addressing, not dismissing.
>>
>> I will look into it, and find out what it would take to make this
>> happen (or, maybe find out why it isn't happening and give a full
>> account).
TB> Thank you. Much appreciated.
TB> Tim.
