List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:harm Date:February 24 2000 9:32pm
Subject:Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!
View as plain text  
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 03:45:43PM -0500, James Treworgy wrote:
> >site. That will always work.
> 
> Unless they back up to the home page, which isn't unheard of. I suppose you 
> could reload the first page they hit using a meta tag after creating the 
> session or something but that doesn't work on all browsers either. On my 
> site it's a likely scenario - it's a subscription based service, and most 
> links from the home page make you log in.  So if you click a link, log in, 
> read the page, and back up, you're no longer logged in without cookies.

No, that is not the case.
_before_ you generete the index you create a session. Sure, you have to
generate all pages with links dynamicly, but in these days with perl,php,
asp, mason etc, this should not be such a big problem. You could
use some url rewrite sheme like http://my.site/do.this.html/<sessionid>
just as easy, couldn`t you?

> > > Basically, you are talking about designing a site with less functionality
> > > than cookies, but this benefits (probably) less than 5% of the people out
> > > there.  So 95% of your users are going to potentially lose their shopping
> 
> >There isn`t less functionality. The only thing you lose is your
> >automatically-filled-in-creditcard number. Big loss.
> 
> I'm talking about potential session loss as for reduced functionality.

which won`t happen, if you do it carefully.

> > > kart contents,  and the other 5% might be pissed of when they see that 
> > code
> > > up there and realize they are being tracked.
> >
> >... but when he comes back he has a different one. How nice!
> 
> I don't think this matters, as I said you can still link sessions using 
> other info, and the fact is you are following their pattern within a 
> session and could use that info within a single session to display certain 
> adz or whatever.

Sure, but the big picture is gone. And sessiontracking between diffrent
sites gets al lot trickier.

> In actuality, my web site uses both versions.  I originally developed it 
> NOT using cookies and found that the session loss when a user backs up to 
> the home page was an egregious problem for many users. So I added a simple 
> cookie that stores the same code on their machine.  So the page 
> authentication first checks for a cookie. If no cookie is found, it checks 
> for the session query variable.  So perhaps this is the best of all 
> worlds... for most people, they get a cookie and it just works.  For any 
> non cookiers it will still work unless they back up to the home page after 
> logging in.  But if I did it again I doubt I would go through the trouble 
> of tracking sessions on each link.

Which was just what I was going to propose and how I solved it. :-)
Only I have the cookies off as default. You have to check a selectbox 
somewhere and then you get a cookie with a sessionid. 

So I still think you best build a shoppingkart or something _without_ 
cookie support in mind. Add the cookies as a extra for the people willing
to sacrifice their privacy for a little convenience. This way it is
possible to let those who wish to remain anonymous use your site, and as a
bonus you lose these 'How to enable cookies'-pages ;-)


Harm

-- 
                       Today is Setting Orange, the 55th of Chaos, 3166.
                                The Moon is Waning Gibbous (72% of Full)
                                                  nieuw.nl - 2dehands.nl
Thread
Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark Lo24 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark Ferraretto24 Feb
    • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
      • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark D Wolinski24 Feb
        • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Faisal Nasim24 Feb
          • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark D Wolinski24 Feb
            • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
          • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark Ferraretto25 Feb
        • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
          • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Nicolas Prade24 Feb
          • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mike Wexler24 Feb
            • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
          • Re: [PHP3] RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ron Chmara24 Feb
            • Re: [PHP3] RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
          • Re: [PHP3] RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ron Chmara25 Feb
    • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Joshua Chamas25 Feb
  • Re: [PHP3] Althernatives other than cookie!!!Gregor Welters24 Feb
  • R: [PHP3] Althernatives other than cookie!!!(Delbono)24 Feb
    • Re: R: [PHP3] Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mike Wexler24 Feb
  • Re: [PHP3] Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ron Chmara24 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Christian Jaeger25 Feb
    • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ann Cantelow25 Feb
    • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ray Zimmerman25 Feb
RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Paul Comber24 Feb
  • RE: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!harm24 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
    • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!harm24 Feb
      • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy24 Feb
        • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!harm25 Feb
          • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!James Treworgy25 Feb
        • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Mark Russell25 Feb
Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Ed Carp25 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Benjamin Pflugmann25 Feb
  • Re: Althernatives other than cookie!!!Tom Fishwick26 Feb