List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Dan Nelson Date:February 24 2000 5:01am
Subject:Re: Using MERGE library?
View as plain text  
In the last episode (Feb 24), Michael Widenius said:
> Greg> I have an application for which it would be very convenient to be able
> Greg> to treat multiple tables as one table.  (Specifically, I have
> Greg> time-series data which periodically gets partially moved to archival
> Greg> storage to save space, but I would like to be able to occasionally run
> Greg> various summary calculations on the whole data set.)
> 
> Tim> Why allow changes at all? Why not let people set up their own 'merges'?
> 
> Because if you are working on a set of tables you may want to change
> the set sooner or later.  One could do this with 'drop table' +
> create, but it would be nice to be able to do it faster...
[...]
> I agree; The idea is that the MERGE tables should be able to directly
> use the indexes on the underlying tables; It's just a question of
> simulating the normal key functions on the mapped tables (In other
> words; When you search after a row you should have to do a key search
> on each of the merged tables).

You know, you're >< this far away from implementing partitioned tables
and putting Oracle out of business :)  Consider adding the ability to
automatically create a new partition every xxx units (days,
auto-increment values, etc).

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@stripped
Thread
Using MERGE library?Greg Fast23 Feb
  • Using MERGE library?Michael Widenius23 Feb
    • Re: Using MERGE library?Tim Bunce23 Feb
      • Re: Using MERGE library?Michael Widenius24 Feb
        • Re: Using MERGE library?Dan Nelson24 Feb
        • Re: Using MERGE library?Tim Bunce24 Feb
          • Re: Using MERGE library?Michael Widenius24 Feb
  • Re: Using MERGE library?Jan Dvorak24 Feb
    • Re: Using MERGE library?Michael Widenius24 Feb