I have a similar discussion with people in my company.
I had been using MySQL for non-production purposes internally and have
been trying to use it for production level things/tools.
But all the executives and VPs are not comfortable and their
I have to base my business on something is that almost free and
hack together by a bunch of programmers?
They also said that if we use Oracle and it failed, we can
at least sue them :)
>To: "Sasha Pachev" <sasha@stripped>, <mysql@stripped>
>Subject: Re: Oracle vs MySQL contest
>Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 13:34:48 +0300
> > MySQL is very different in from Oracle-type databases in the way it is
> > marketed, supported, and licenced. It is more affordable, and much
> > better supported, as all of us know very well. Unfortunately, there are
> > many executives and developers that still do not trust MySQL, because of
> > some missing features, the need for workarounds, etc. To overcome this
> > prejudice while helping Monty and the bunch improve MySQL I am proposing
> > a contest - Oracle vs MySQL.
>I think it certainly is a question about prejudice, as you stated and
>expected your message to generate a lot of replies. Instead no-one
>seems to react. I just wonder what the reason might be? Are the
>developers of MySQL affraid that their db-engine wouldn't cope
>against the Oracle in performance-tests or are they affraid of
>aggravating the big db-giant into offensive action? One thing is for
>sure; a lot of people rule out MySQL in the very beginning when
>developing largescale, performance critical and stable systems just
>because there is not enough reliable comparative data available.
>Oracle rides on its history and reputation as a fast and stable,
>database when MySQL does not have the same kind of credibility,
>at least not at the broader scale.
>It should be in every MySQL-enthusiast's interest to clarify the
>differences between MySQL and heavy and expensive databases
>like Oracle. Even if MySQL would loose some parts of the
>competition, it still is quite much more affordable than Oracle and
>alike. If you could just get out a message of assurance, that MySQL
>is in fact a very competitive, stable and fast solution, even when
>comparing to it's heavy-weight rivals, I defenitely think people would
>consider it more carefully when making decisions about databases
>in large projects.
>To sum it up, it would be quite a good idea to set up a competition of
>somekind, as you suggested. Another thing that would be appreciated
>is some kind of collection of statements from people, that have used
>MySQL-successfully in large-scale performance-critical systems;
>preferably by people from well-known and recognized organisations
>worldwide. These kinds of actions would earn MySQL the recognition
>and respect in the worldwide IT-industry that it deserves.
>Please check "http://www.mysql.com/Manual_chapter/manual_toc.html" before
>posting. To request this thread, e-mail mysql-thread2381@stripped
>To unsubscribe, send a message to the address shown in the
>List-Unsubscribe header of this message. If you cannot see it,
>e-mail mysql-unsubscribe@stripped instead.
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com