Re: Why no boolean type?

[Michael Widenius]

>>>>> "sasha" == sasha  <sasha@stripped> writes:

sasha> "Fernando Rodríguez" wrote:
>> 
>> So? O:-)  It seems like a weird omition...
>> 
>> 'Fernando
>> 
>> --

sasha> as Paul said, ENUM('Y', 'N') will do the trick in some cases, and in others you
sasha> can use tinyint.

sasha> Are you porting something that uses BOOLEAN type.

sasha> Monty, what do you think about parsing the BOOLEAN syntax and treating it as
sasha> TINYINT ?

We already do that for the BOOL type.

Regards,
Monty