| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Fred Lindberg | Date: | April 27 1999 8:04pm |
| Subject: | Re: transaction support | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 12:55:31 -0700, David Wall wrote: >ala postgresql? Transactions are not mentioned in the features list, so I >suspect not, but I know that it's a bit of a worry not to be able to ensure >ACID properties are maintained -- at least with respect to multiple tables >within a single db. Not supported. Most of the time, the functionality is easy to get via locking. There are atomic updates (e.g. UPDATE SET a=a+1). -Sincerely, Fred (Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • transaction support | David Wall | 27 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Sasha Pachev | 28 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Nem W Schlecht | 28 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Thimble Smith | 28 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Fred Lindberg | 28 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Fred Lindberg | 28 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Volker Paepcke | 29 Apr |
| • Re: transaction support | Fred Lindberg | 29 Apr |
