| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | April 27 1999 5:37pm |
| Subject: | Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 12:18 PM -0500 4/27/99, <unknown@stripped> wrote: >> Is it normal ? Is there a plan to optimize the CLIENT_COMPRESS >> protocol in order to have more rapid transfers ? Why not to use the >> gzip algorithm (it's GNU isn't it ?) ? > >Perhaps because whenever you incorporate GNU code into a package and >release it, the entire package falls under GNU license, which would be >remarkably horrible for MySQL. Huh? MySQL already includes GNU code - the readline library. -- Paul DuBois, paul@stripped Northern League Chronicles: http://www.snake.net/nl/
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | unknown | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Paul DuBois | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | unknown | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 28 Apr |
| • Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 28 Apr |
| • Stupid question!! | Ryan | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Stupid question!! | Darrell Shifflett | 28 Apr |
| • RE: Stupid question!! | Ryan | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Fred Lindberg | 27 Apr |
