| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Fred Lindberg | Date: | April 27 1999 4:19pm |
| Subject: | Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 18:06:54 +0200, BAUMEISTER Alexandre wrote: > Is it normal ? Is there a plan to optimize the CLIENT_COMPRESS > protocol in order to have more rapid transfers ? Why not to use the > gzip algorithm (it's GNU isn't it ?) ? I don't know how CLIENT_COMPRESS is implemented, but usually, network bandwidth is NOT the bottle neck. Thus, the compression should be able to work with a small window and be very fast, rather than compress maximally. The gain is in the number of buffer reads required, etc. This should be noticeable only with transfer of relatively large volumes of data (large result sets). When compressing files, gzip can take its time and work with a large window. -Sincerely, Fred (Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | unknown | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Paul DuBois | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | unknown | 27 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 28 Apr |
| • Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | Michael Widenius | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Reaction: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol !!! | BAUMEISTER Alexandre | 28 Apr |
| • Stupid question!! | Ryan | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Stupid question!! | Darrell Shifflett | 28 Apr |
| • RE: Stupid question!! | Ryan | 28 Apr |
| • Re: Compression with CLIENT_COMPRESS protocol ? | Fred Lindberg | 27 Apr |
