You left out a word between "its" ... and ... "history and reputation"
The word is "erroneous" :-))
Johan Engström wrote:
> > MySQL is very different in from Oracle-type databases in the way it is
> > marketed, supported, and licenced. It is more affordable, and much
> > better supported, as all of us know very well. Unfortunately, there are
> > many executives and developers that still do not trust MySQL,
> Oracle rides on its history and reputation as a fast and stable,
> database when MySQL does not have the same kind of credibility,
> at least not at the broader scale.