On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 12:43:28 -0700, Luke Hewitt wrote:
>of the work-arounds focus on unique identifiers. The code I am currently
>working on requires that I have a loop which starts with the first row and
>continues down the table until it has finished. The problem with a unique
Why no a single query ORDER BY ... and then loop through the result? It
sounds like you otherwise would do a query per row, which is not
efficient.
-Sincerely, Fred
(Frederik Lindberg, Infectious Diseases, WashU, St. Louis, MO, USA)
