Re: OT Milennium

[Chris]

Can we call it 'Starr Date'? :)

--Chris

On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Alvin Starr wrote:

> So over all we need a counter that is 2^82 bits in size. If we pick a 128
> bit counter we should be ok.
> 
> We may also want to pick a standard for the minimal tick that is not based
> on a human standard but on somthing like an atomic time period.
> 
> Although I started this as a some what tounge-in-cheek response to the
> previous email. The more I think about it the more sense it makes.