|List:||General Discussion||« Previous MessageNext Message »|
|From:||Rafał Radecki||Date:||September 11 2013 8:11am|
|Subject:||binlog_format and pt-table-checksum?|
|View as plain text|
Hi All. I use binlog_format = row for my production databases. In this format most binlog_format changes are sent not as SQL statements but in some other format. I understand that when binlog_format = statement is used, queries on master and slave can give different results, but should pt-table-cheksum be used in situation when we use binlog_format = row? I've seen opinions that regardles of binlog_format the data on slave and master may differ. What are your experiences? Best regards, Rafał.
|• binlog_format and pt-table-checksum?||Rafał Radecki||11 Sep 2013|
|• Re: binlog_format and pt-table-checksum?||Andrew Moore||11 Sep 2013|
|• Re: binlog_format and pt-table-checksum?||Johan De Meersman||11 Sep 2013|