From: Reindl Harald
Date: February 8 2013 5:43am
Subject: Re: Major MySQL Revision Takes on NoSQL
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/228942
Message-Id: <51149098.1040406@thelounge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="----enig2LVVXHOCACIDUSIKTPXAM"

------enig2LVVXHOCACIDUSIKTPXAM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Am 08.02.2013 03:51, schrieb Peter Brawley:
> On 2013-02-07 8:29 PM, Daevid Vincent wrote:
>> http://adtmag.com/articles/2013/02/06/mysql-update.aspx
>=20
> The headline is weirdly deceptive. Mebbe they thought the headline woul=
d draw eyes to their ads.
>=20
> This edition of MySQL is less like NoSQL, and more determinedly relatio=
nal, than any before.
>=20
> It'd be more accurate to say that Monty & David anticipated NoSQL by a =
decade. The early editions of MySQL, with no
> ACID compliance, no foreign keys, no transactions, were more like NoSQL=
 than any version of MySQL released since 2004.

much more interesting:

>> This release promises to crank up query execution times with pre-execu=
tion
>> subqueries. Diagnostics are improved with EXPLAIN for INSERT, UPDATE, =
and
>> DELETE operations, and the ability to output in JSON. And a new Optimi=
zer
>> Traces tool allows users to track the optimizer decision-making proces=
s

does this also affect MyISAM or is the engine only a unloved child
since the switch to innodb as default engine?


------enig2LVVXHOCACIDUSIKTPXAM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEUkJgACgkQhmBjz394Ank+PQCeNRULhl4LzP5c4hmoOJZM5Loc
4dsAoIYs7725TSyNw9dMvnd7CM6HxHxy
=WiB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------enig2LVVXHOCACIDUSIKTPXAM--