| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | January 4 2000 2:55am |
| Subject: | Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 8:20 PM -0500 2000-01-03, Bob Strouper wrote: > >There are two (common) methods with MySQL to get a >>unique id - and you have mixed both. > >looks like I have to use id+1 on both a column with auto >increment and one without :-/ No, you'd use one or the other. >But I am now even more confused as to why I still have to use >the id+1 with the auto incrementing column type. You don't. It's used only with non-AUTO_INCREMENT columns. -- Paul DuBois, paul@stripped
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Bob Strouper | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Paul DuBois | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Paul DuBois | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Tonu Samuel | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Benjamin Pflugmann | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Benjamin Pflugmann | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | hypnos | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Bob Strouper | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Paul DuBois | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Benjamin Pflugmann | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Benjamin Pflugmann | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Bob Strouper | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Benjamin Pflugmann | 4 Jan |
| • Re: sequence table: Definitive answer please! | Bob Strouper | 4 Jan |
