List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Rik Wasmus Date:March 21 2012 10:07am
Subject:Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40
View as plain text  
> You keep repeating that, and I already replied to it the first time. If my
> answer isn't acceptable, spamming the question isn't going to make it
> better - or make people more inclined to help you, for that matter.

I concur
-- 
Rik Wasmus
Thread
date comparison querySimon Wilkinson16 Mar
  • Re: date comparison queryBaron Schwartz16 Mar
  • Re: date comparison queryhsv17 Mar
    • One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Charles Brown18 Mar
      • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Johan De Meersman19 Mar
  • One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Charles Brown19 Mar
  • RE: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Charles Brown21 Mar
    • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Johan De Meersman21 Mar
      • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Rik Wasmus21 Mar
        • RE: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Charles Brown22 Mar
          • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Nuno Tavares22 Mar
            • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Michael Dykman22 Mar
          • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Reindl Harald22 Mar
            • RE: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Charles Brown22 Mar
          • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Mark Goodge22 Mar
    • Re: One inst has 39 columns- the other 40Reindl Harald21 Mar
      • tables do not have the same number of columns. Charles Brown22 Mar
        • Re: tables do not have the same number of columns.Johan De Meersman22 Mar