According to Michael Dykman <mdykman@stripped> on Fri, 02/24/12 at 14:10:
>
> *maybe* your router is doing some packet mangling? Wild shot in the dark..
That is worth investigating... :-)
Thanks.
> Perhaps try hitting that 'local' server' from a remote client to see
> if the effect is the same? Is this the one misbehaving?
This is also worth trying, but both of these attempts will have to
wait until Monday when I can arrange the tests.
> What I meant to say was: I can't think of a better way to spend a
> weekend. Have fun!
Weekend, no, but come Monday, I will be able to try out some of these
concepts. I do, however, plan to "have fun" this weekend... ;^)
Regards,
web...
--
William Bulley Email: web@stripped
72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->|
| Thread |
|---|
| • two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | Michael Dykman | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | Michael Dykman | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | Michael Dykman | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | Andrew Moore | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | Michael Dykman | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |
| • Re: two 5.1 servers, different behaviour | William Bulley | 24 Feb |