List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Arthur Fuller Date:September 14 2011 5:34pm
Subject:Re: optimising for 100000 entries
View as plain text  
Call me stupid, but IMO this is just plain Bad Design. Maybe your masters
are making you want to deliver this, but it's frankly insane. Go instead
with the Sally Rand Principle: show them just enough to pique their
interest. Given that you've narrowed it down to the WHERE clause, try again.
WHERE <someField> LIKE 'xyz', and narrow your list from there. Nobody wants
to view 100K buttons or choices or whatever. The most I want to see is about
20, at any given take.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Ananda Kumar <anandkl@stripped> wrote:

> So,
> You want to have 100,000 buttons for 100,000 entries or just have one
> filter column, which allows you to specify any type of "WHERE CONDITION"
>
> regards
> anandkl
>
>
>

Thread
optimising for 100000 entriesThe Doctor14 Sep
  • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesAnanda Kumar14 Sep
    • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesArthur Fuller14 Sep
      • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesAnanda Kumar14 Sep
        • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesArthur Fuller14 Sep
        • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesThe Doctor14 Sep
Re: optimising for 100000 entriesThe Doctor15 Sep
  • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesWm Mussatto15 Sep
  • Re: optimising for 100000 entriesmos16 Sep