| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Michael Cole | Date: | July 13 2011 3:44am |
| Subject: | Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | ||
| View as plain text | |||
He is pushing his own products here, Looking at other implications of moving to a NoSQL system I would stay with an SQL system. NoSql has its place, but maybe not in such an environment. http://blogs.adobe.com/asset/2011/04/nosql-but-even-less-security.html Regards Michael Cole. On Wednesday 13 July 2011 7:33:43 am Hank wrote: > Given the choice between doing right the first time, or having the second > largest site on the internet, I'll take the latter, and deal with the > problems of not doing it right the first time. > > > -Hank > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Jerry Schwartz <jerry@stripped> wrote: > > Let this be a lesson to all of those designers who say "That will never > > happen."
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Daevid Vincent | 11 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Claudio Nanni | 11 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Per Jessen | 12 Jul |
| • RE: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Jerry Schwartz | 12 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Peter Brawley | 12 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Hank | 13 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Michael Cole | 13 Jul |
| • Re: Facebook Trapped In MySQL a 'Fate Worse Than Death' | Rob Wultsch | 20 Jul |
