| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Johan De Meersman | Date: | March 31 2011 4:06pm |
| Subject: | Re: A common request | ||
| View as plain text | |||
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregory Magarshak" <greg@stripped> > I am guessing that the MySQL indexes map indexed fields (fb_uid) to the > primary key (id) so I wouldn't have to touch the disk. Am I right > about that? Correct for InnoDB, but MyISAM maps every index straight onto records. That's why secondary indices are slightly more performant on MyISAM tables - InnoDB needs to do the extra primary key lookup - which it of course is bloody good at :-) -- Bier met grenadyn Is als mosterd by den wyn Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • A common request | Gregory Magarshak | 29 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Peter Brawley | 29 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Gregory Magarshak | 29 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Peter Brawley | 29 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Gregory Magarshak | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Gregory Magarshak | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Johan De Meersman | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | mos | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Johan De Meersman | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | mos | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Wm Mussatto | 31 Mar |
| • Re: A common request | Sander de Bruijne | 29 Mar |
