List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Noel Butler Date:January 31 2011 10:50am
Subject:Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information available
View as plain text  
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 11:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:

> Have you rebuilt all depending applications AFTER
> rebuild of mysql 5.5?
> 


yes, built 5.5 a month ago, only today rebuilt postfix (upgraded 2.7.2
to 2.8.0)
This is a common problem, google fu indicates others have same problem,
some of them claim reverting to 5.5.7 corrects this error, there was
major changes from 5.5.7 to 5.5.8, but I don't see the sense in
downgrading to what was regarded as unstable mysql version to correct
it. just as well this is on a dev testbed and not production, more of a
reason production will stay on 5.1 I think.




> BTW:
> I also make my own source-builds with optimized flags but not dumb
> configure & make, the better way is to build clean distro-packages
> and install them with the package-manager, this way you would


I totally disagree. but thats the beauty about open source, each to
their own.


 when there is only one version of the lib installed it should not be an
issue, I've been building tarballs for 20 years, so do understand  how
the OS works and how to best use configure :)



> Am 31.01.2011 11:38, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 10:52 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> You need mysql-5.1 compat-libs package
> >> or rebuild applications against 5.5
> >>
> >> for feddora/rhel type "compat-mysql51" in google
> >> there are packages from remi since he builds 5.5
> >>
> >> this is nothing new and was the same with 5.1
> >> while applications was linked against 5.0
> >>
> > 
> > HUH? These are all source builds,  I did not have this problem previously, I
> don't use package maintainers versions.
> > I have source builds of mysql, postfix, dovecot, apache, php, bind - pretty much
> all the common main daemons, i
> > don't trust distro butchers , err, i mean maintainers, for these critical apps.
> > 
> > thanks anyway.
> 
> >> Am 31.01.2011 09:24, schrieb Noel Butler:
> >> > 
> >> > Arg!  This abomination  5.5 is causing more headaches,
> >> > 
> >> > postfix will not run, I've heard dovecot may not either, amongst
> others
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > postconf: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16: no version information
> available (required by postcon
> >> > /etc/init.d/postfix start
> >> > * Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfix                        
>                       postconf:
> >> > /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16: no version information available
> (required by postconf)
> >> > /usr/sbin/postconf: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16: no version
> information available (required by /usr/sbin/postconf)
> >> > /usr/sbin/postconf: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16: no version
> information available (required by /usr/sbin/postconf)
> >> >                                                                        
>                 [fail]
> >> > *sigh*  Why was this removed, or is this another side affect of that
> amazing winblozy P.O.S cmake?
> >>
> > 
> 



Attachment: [text/html]
Attachment: [text/html]
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
Thread
libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableNoel Butler31 Jan
  • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableReindl Harald31 Jan
    • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableNoel Butler31 Jan
      • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableReindl Harald31 Jan
        • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableNoel Butler31 Jan
    • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableJoerg Bruehe31 Jan
      • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableReindl Harald31 Jan
  • Re: libmysqlclient.so.16 no version information availableJoerg Bruehe31 Jan