From: Reindl Harald
Date: January 25 2011 4:28pm
Subject: Re: InnoDB and rsync
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/224222
Message-Id: <4D3EFA3F.9080409@thelounge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig450EB4BC26B7776D6230484A"

--------------enig450EB4BC26B7776D6230484A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



Am 25.01.2011 16:56, schrieb Robinson, Eric:

> You say that like it doesn't mean a huge amount of additional work,
> expense, and complexity. We currently have 240+ master MySQL instances
> and are adding them at a rate of several per week.

240 mysql-servers?
why there is no consolidation?

> Based on everything you've said so far, I still prefer my solution. I
> just need a way to make the same thing work with InnoDB.

this is simply impossible

--=20

Mit besten Gr=FC=DFen, Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-1060 Vienna, Hofm=FChlgasse 17
CTO / software-development / cms-solutions
p: +43 (1) 595 3999 33, m: +43 (676) 40 221 40
icq: 154546673, http://www.thelounge.net/


--------------enig450EB4BC26B7776D6230484A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk0++j8ACgkQhmBjz394AnkjlQCgnPxySGjIPOUv0NeXgZL1J1LN
lZEAn11O7E9L4qxZGKNiaR8WmX2LbEnq
=kfXq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig450EB4BC26B7776D6230484A--