| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Carsten Pedersen | Date: | January 23 2011 2:49pm |
| Subject: | Re: CURRENT insert ID | ||
| View as plain text | |||
ehr... Den 23-01-2011 15:36, Carsten Pedersen skrev: > Seeing from later posts that you're using InnoDB, why don't you simply > wrap the INSERT/UPDATE into a transaction? You don't avoid the UPDATE, > but I'm not sure I understand the need to mess w/ triggers. > > BEGIN > INSERT INTO t(id) NULL > UPDATE t SET xxx=last_insert_id() UPDATE t SET xxx=i WHERE i=last_insert_id() obviously. Sorry. Best, / Carsten
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | joao | 21 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Darryle Steplight | 21 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | joao | 21 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Donovan Brooke | 22 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Jesper Wisborg Krogh | 22 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 24 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Mark Goodge | 24 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Jaime Crespo Rincón | 24 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Carsten Pedersen | 23 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Carsten Pedersen | 23 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 24 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Michael Dykman | 21 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
| • Re: CURRENT insert ID | Michael Dykman | 21 Jan |
| • RE: CURRENT insert ID | Jerry Schwartz | 21 Jan |
