| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Johan De Meersman | Date: | November 22 2010 2:36pm |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL replication server | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:08 PM, John Daisley <daisleyjohn@stripped>wrote: > The replicated database should not be accepting writes, if it is then you > haven't set it up correctly > *shrug* I never bother. The slave is way too useful to fuck around with optimisations and whatnot, reporting tools tend to do useful aggregations, et cetera. You may like to set it read-only, but that doesn't make it the only way, let a lone a requirement. -- Bier met grenadyn Is als mosterd by den wyn Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • MySQL replication server | Machiel Richards | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | John Daisley | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | a.smith | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | Machiel Richards | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | a.smith | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | John Daisley | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | Tyler Poland | 22 Nov |
| • Re: MySQL replication server | Johan De Meersman | 22 Nov |
