| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Johan De Meersman | Date: | October 19 2010 12:07pm |
| Subject: | Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos data is revealed. | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Carl <carl@stripped> wrote: > Johan, > > You state that master - master is not reliable in dual active environments. > I am in the process of setting up just such an environment (moderate active > on the primary server, lighter activity on the other server.) Do you know > where I can get some information on the risks? > On the MySQL site, I guess :-) Your major issue is likely to be the lack of two-phase commits (which has been added in the most recent release, iirc): even if you properly interleave your autoincrements, the lack of a true global lock means you still risk conflicting updates. I can't really tell you a single spot where I got my knowledge on the subject - I'm a long-time and multi-platform DBA, so it's a combination of stuff I read and an understanding of how things work - or don't. -- Bier met grenadyn Is als mosterd by den wyn Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | Brent Clark | 18 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | short cutter | 19 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | Johan De Meersman | 19 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos data is revealed. | Carl | 19 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | Johan De Meersman | 19 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | Walter Heck - OlinData.com | 20 Oct |
| • Re: Master Master Replication ... do a fail over and a week agos datais revealed. | Johan De Meersman | 21 Oct |
