| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Paul DuBois | Date: | December 28 1999 7:13pm |
| Subject: | Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | ||
| View as plain text | |||
At 8:07 PM +0100 1999-12-28, Matthias Urlichs wrote: >Hi, > >Paul DuBois: >> >> As of 3.23, if you use the MyISAM table storage type, the sequence >> will be monotonic without values being reused. (The sequence will, >> however, still restart at zero if you empty the table completely.) >> >What happens if the range is too small? Range of what? The underlying column type? Same thing as before, you'll get a duplicate key error. Choose a type that's "big enough". :-) -- Paul DuBois, paul@stripped
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | chris | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | James Lyon | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Chris Shenton | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | James Lyon | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Paul DuBois | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Matthias Urlichs | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Paul DuBois | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Chris Shenton | 28 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Peter J. Schoenster | 29 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Paul DuBois | 29 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | hypnos | 29 Dec |
| • Re: AUTO_INCREMENT not guaranteed unique after DELETE | Ken Scott | 29 Dec |
