| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | a.smith | Date: | September 2 2010 2:35pm |
| Subject: | Re: Replication VS Cluster | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Clustering is a general term, do you know which one you are comparing with replication? Clustering most typically refers to high availability clustering or high performance clustering, which wouldnt necessarily/normally imply any copy of the actual data. If you want a copy of your data on another server, replication is the obvious choice. Assuming the realities of replication arent a problem with respect to your requirements, ie replication is asynchronous... Andy.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Replication VS Cluster | Jangita | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Johan De Meersman | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Jangita | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | a.smith | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Jangita | 2 Sep |
| • RE: Replication VS Cluster | Neil Aggarwal | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Johan De Meersman | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Johan De Meersman | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | a.smith | 2 Sep |
| • Re: Replication VS Cluster | Johan De Meersman | 2 Sep |
