| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jan Steinman | Date: | April 5 2010 2:25pm |
| Subject: | RE: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
> From: Gavin Towey <gtowey@stripped> > > InnoDB should be your default for all tables, unless you have > specific requirements that need myisam. One specific example of an > appropriate task for myisam is where you need very high insert > throughput, and you're not doing any updates/deletes concurrently. A couple other things: InnoDB does relations better, MyISAM does search of text fields. ---------------- If we can control fuel we can control the masses; if we can control food we can control individuals. -- Henry Kissinger :::: Jan Steinman, EcoReality Co-op ::::
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Mitchell Maltenfort | 2 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Carsten Pedersen | 2 Apr |
| • RE: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Gavin Towey | 2 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Dan Nelson | 2 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Mitchell Maltenfort | 3 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Walter Heck - OlinData.com | 3 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Mitchell Maltenfort | 3 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Kyong Kim | 6 Apr |
| • RE: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Jan Steinman | 5 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Kyong Kim | 8 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | mos | 8 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Kyong Kim | 9 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | mos | 9 Apr |
| • Re: MyISAM better than innodb for large files? | Lucky Wijaya | 10 Apr |
