List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Johan De Meersman Date:March 12 2010 3:51pm
Subject:Re: mysql proxy in production?
View as plain text  
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati <
prajapatikc@stripped> wrote:

> The below link shows the benchmark between different web servers ( apache,
> niginx, cherokee).
>

Irrelevant to this list, but I'll bite: there is no detail whatsoever on the
configuration of the various software. It also only tests the repeated
delivery of one html file, presumably static and identical across the
servers. Were the servers forked or threaded, how many concurrent clients
did they allow, what modules were loaded, how do the respective servers
respond to different filesizes, to various kinds of dynamic content, et
cetera ad nauseam.

All we know from this, is that Cherokee is your best choice if you want to
serve a site with only one, static page without images.



-- 
Bier met grenadyn
Is als mosterd by den wyn
Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel
Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel

Thread
mysql proxy in production?Brent Clark11 Mar
  • Re: mysql proxy in production?Krishna Chandra Prajapati11 Mar
    • Re: mysql proxy in production?Johan De Meersman11 Mar
      • Re: mysql proxy in production?John Daisley11 Mar
        • Re: mysql proxy in production?Walter Heck - OlinData.com12 Mar
          • Re: mysql proxy in production?Krishna Chandra Prajapati12 Mar
    • Re: mysql proxy in production?Brent Clark11 Mar
      • Re: mysql proxy in production?Mark Matthews11 Mar
      • Re: mysql proxy in production?Johan De Meersman12 Mar
        • Re: mysql proxy in production?Krishna Chandra Prajapati12 Mar
          • Re: mysql proxy in production?Johan De Meersman12 Mar