List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jerry Schwartz Date:February 1 2010 4:22pm
Subject:RE: WAMP vs LAMP
View as plain text  
Thanks for the clarification. As I understand it, the syntax on the client end 
is to use "." as the host name.

I was using "localhost" on the LAMP configuration, and never bothered to 
change it. With 7 or so web-based users, there isn't much rush.

Regards,

Jerry Schwartz
The Infoshop by Global Information Incorporated
195 Farmington Ave.
Farmington, CT 06032

860.674.8796 / FAX: 860.674.8341

www.the-infoshop.com


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Shawn.Green@stripped [mailto:Shawn.Green@stripped]
>Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:07 AM
>To: Jerry Schwartz
>Cc: 'Wagner Bianchi'; mysql@stripped
>Subject: Re: WAMP vs LAMP
>
>Jerry Schwartz wrote:
>> From: Wagner Bianchi [mailto:wagnerbianchijr@stripped]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 2:03 PM
>> To: Jerry Schwartz
>> Subject: Re: WAMP vs LAMP
>>
>>
>>
>> [JS] The file paths were all the same, actually, and the address for MySQL 
>> is
>just "localhost".
>>
>> [WB]Consider to use MySQL on Unix like environment because the socket file.
>This way you will get more performance then use TCP/IP on MS Windows.
>>
>>
>>
>> [JS] That's an interesting suggestion. Windows has socket files, but I've
>never looked at them. In fact, I don't even know if MySQL can us a socket 
>file
>and  TCP/IP at the same time. We're going to have more ODBC traffic than web
>traffic, I expect.
>>
>
>On Windows they aren't called "sockets", they are "named pipes" and yes
>you can be listening to both internal and external connections at the
>same time.
>
>--enabled-named-pipe
>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/server-
>options.html#option_mysqld_enable-named-pipe
>
>When connecting locally, you have both options at your disposal
>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/connecting.html
>
>There is even another option for Windows, --shared-memory
>http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/server-
>options.html#option_mysqld_shared-memory
>
>This works similar to a named pipe and if you want to enable both (pipes
>and shares) at the same time, you need to provide different names.  The
>TCP/IP ports are independent and also available.
>
>--
>Shawn Green, MySQL Senior Support Engineer
>Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>Office: Blountville, TN
>
>
>
>
>--
>MySQL General Mailing List
>For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
>To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=1
>infoshop.com




Thread
Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Philipp Maske [Location Bretagne]24 Jan
  • RE: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Daevid Vincent26 Jan
    • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Dan Nelson26 Jan
      • RE: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Daevid Vincent26 Jan
        • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Shawn Green27 Jan
          • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Wagner Bianchi27 Jan
          • RE: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Jerry Schwartz27 Jan
            • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Johan De Meersman27 Jan
              • WAMP vs LAMPJerry Schwartz28 Jan
                • how to get the name of primary key ?曹凯1 Feb
                  • Re: how to get the name of primary key ?Thiyaghu CK1 Feb
                    • RE: how to get the name of primary key ?曹凯1 Feb
                  • Re: how to get the name of primary key ?Jesper Wisborg Krogh1 Feb
                    • RE: how to get the name of primary key ?曹凯1 Feb
                      • Re: how to get the name of primary key ?prabhat kumar1 Feb
        • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Johan De Meersman27 Jan
          • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Shawn Green27 Jan
            • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Dan Nelson27 Jan
              • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Johan De Meersman27 Jan
    • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Joerg Bruehe26 Jan
    • Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Johan De Meersman26 Jan
Re: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37Shawn Green26 Jan
RE: Event feature already working in Server 5.1.37John Daisley 27 Jan
RE: WAMP vs LAMPJerry Schwartz29 Jan
  • Re: WAMP vs LAMPWagner Bianchi29 Jan
    • RE: WAMP vs LAMPJerry Schwartz1 Feb
  • Re: WAMP vs LAMPShawn Green1 Feb
    • RE: WAMP vs LAMPJerry Schwartz1 Feb