List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Johnny Withers Date:January 12 2010 9:15pm
Subject:Re: file per table performance
View as plain text  
There are a few articles on this at MySQL Performance Blog:

http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/?s=innodb_file_per_table+performance



On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Bryan Cantwell <bcantwell@stripped>wrote:

> Anyone have information they can provide on the performance hit of using
> innodb_file_per_table?
> I'd assume that since there are many individual tables that this would slow
> performance, but perhaps not.
> In a huge database, is this not a good idea, or a better one?
>
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=1
>
>


-- 
-----------------------------
Johnny Withers
601.209.4985
johnny@stripped

Thread
upgrading mysqlLawrence Sorrillo12 Jan
  • Re: upgrading mysqlTom Worster12 Jan
    • RE: upgrading mysqlJoshua Gordon12 Jan
    • Re: upgrading mysqlLawrence Sorrillo12 Jan
      • Re: upgrading mysqlTom Worster12 Jan
        • Re: upgrading mysqlSuresh Kuna13 Jan
        • Re: upgrading mysqlLawrence Sorrillo13 Jan
          • Re: upgrading mysqlfsb13 Jan
          • Re: upgrading mysqlPaul DuBois14 Jan
  • Re: upgrading mysqlShawn Green12 Jan
    • Re: upgrading mysqlLawrence Sorrillo12 Jan
      • Re: upgrading mysqlPaul DuBois12 Jan
  • file per table performanceBryan Cantwell12 Jan
    • Re: file per table performanceJohnny Withers12 Jan