Thanks.
Yes it's a delicate construct but tables like 'IP2Location' give me a
headache as NDB tables.
Yet I have to test if 7.0.X can handle it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dykman [mailto:mdykman@stripped]
Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Oktober 2009 17:33
To: Christian Meisinger
Cc: mysql@stripped
Subject: Re: MySQL Cluster / NDB & MyISAM mix
I can think of no reason why this shouldn't work, My administrator
colleagues would probably beat me with 2x4's for handing them such a
delicate construct to maintain in production but it seems perfectly
feasible to me :-)
- michael dykman
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Christian Meisinger
<c.meisinger@stripped> wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Ok lets say i've 2 server running MySQL, NDB node and NDB manager on each.
> Now I don't want to convert all tables to NDB instead I leave a few as
> MyISAM.
> Is it officially supported if I setup a master-master replication between
> the two MySQL instances and add ignore entries for all NDB tables?
>
> So basically I would convert all important tables to NDB and leave other
> tables as MyISAM, but they would still be 'synced' via replication.
>
> I've tested it and it look like it works... but... does it work by
> coincidence? :)
>
>
> Thanks, chris
>
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=1
>
>
--
- michael dykman
- mdykman@stripped
Dont worry about people stealing your ideas. If theyre any good,
youll have to ram them down their throats!
Howard Aiken
