| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | nigel wood | Date: | July 3 2009 10:39am |
| Subject: | Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
nigel wood wrote: > > Here's a rough table stucture. The indexes in events tables would be > TargetId. But problably TargetId+EventDate probably eventId+event date > as you found more uses/added paging. > Well that didn't format very well :-( The tables structures are: User/Actor ======= TargetId Username EventType ====== EventTypeId LogMesssageText (optional) CurrentEvents,ArchivedEventsNN,MergedEvents ============================= EventId TargetId EventTypeId EventData EventDate HTH Nigel
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Best approach for DB-based event logging? | Marcus Bointon | 1 Jul |
| • Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | Johan De Meersman | 3 Jul |
| • Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | Marcus Bointon | 3 Jul |
| • Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | Johan De Meersman | 3 Jul |
| • Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | nigel wood | 3 Jul |
| • Re: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | nigel wood | 3 Jul |
| • RE: Best approach for DB-based event logging? | Martin Gainty | 3 Jul |
