| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Perrin Harkins | Date: | March 4 2009 4:14pm |
| Subject: | Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Morten <my.lists@stripped> wrote: > Hi, I was hoping that using SQL_NO_CACHE would help me bypass the query > cache, but judging from the below it doesn't. You probably just brought the data into the cache and are not hitting the query cache. - Perrin
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • SQL_NO_CACHE | Morten | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Micah Stevens | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Perrin Harkins | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Thomas Spahni | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Perrin Harkins | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | jocelyn fournier | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Morten Primdahl | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | jocelyn fournier | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Micah | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Jocelyn Fournier | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Morten Primdahl | 4 Mar |
| • Re: SQL_NO_CACHE | Johan De Meersman | 4 Mar |
