| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Baron Schwartz | Date: | February 13 2009 9:43pm |
| Subject: | Re: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Quoting Martijn Tonies out of context,
> A non transactional engine is of near no use.
I wouldn't say that ;-) It's of no use for transactional needs, and
indeed I rarely say it's a good idea to use a nontransactional engine,
but there are very important real-world uses for them.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | Yusuf Khan | 13 Feb |
| • Re: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | Peter Brawley | 13 Feb |
| • RE: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | Jerry Schwartz | 13 Feb |
| • Re: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | Martijn Tonies | 13 Feb |
| • Re: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | Baron Schwartz | 13 Feb |
| • RE: Codd's rule 8 (physical data idependence) | US Data Export | 13 Feb |
