List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Stut Date:September 17 2008 9:16pm
Subject:Re: Finding gaps
View as plain text  
On 17 Sep 2008, at 22:12, Jerry Schwartz wrote:
> I have records that should be sequentially (not auto-increment)  
> numbered,
> but there are gaps. Is there any elegant way of finding the gaps?

Why do they need to be sequential? When this requirement comes up it's  
usually for illogical reasons.

-Stut

-- 
http://stut.net/
Thread
Finding gapsJerry Schwartz17 Sep
  • Re: Finding gapsStut17 Sep
    • Re: Finding gapsPeter Brawley17 Sep
      • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz8 Oct
        • Re: Finding gapsGerald L. Clark8 Oct
          • RE: Finding gapsUS Data Export8 Oct
        • Re: Finding gapsPeter Brawley8 Oct
          • RE: Finding gapsUS Data Export9 Oct
            • Re: Finding gapsPeter Brawley9 Oct
              • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz10 Oct
                • Re: Finding gapsMoon's Father25 Oct
                  • Re: Finding gapsMoon's Father25 Oct
                  • RE: Finding gapsUS Data Export27 Oct
    • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz17 Sep
      • Re: Finding gapsStut18 Sep
        • Re: Finding gapsMr. Shawn H. Corey18 Sep
        • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz18 Sep
          • Re: Finding gapsMike Diehl18 Sep
            • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz18 Sep
    • RE: Finding gapsMartin Gainty18 Sep
      • RE: Finding gapsJerry Schwartz18 Sep
    • Re: Finding gapsJoerg Bruehe18 Sep
    • Re: Finding gapsJoerg Bruehe18 Sep
      • Re: Finding gapsStut18 Sep
        • Re: Finding gapsMr. Shawn H. Corey18 Sep