Tristan Marly schrieb:
> First, thanks for all your suggestions and for beeing so reactive.
>
> @Martin: the explain result was in attachment, but you will have more results in this
> current mail.
>
> @Rob: you are right, the 'show index' shows strange things, cf. below.
>
> @Rodolphe: indeed the STRAIGHT_JOIN has been very helpfull, cf. below.
>
> @Brent: thanks for this very precise and technical answer.
too bad, that all the other list members could not read what was so helpful
... reply to the author instead of to the list is very useful for the
audience ... or was it only me who missed their replies (except from Rub
Wulsch)?
--
Sebastian
| Thread |
|---|
| • Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | tmarly | 11 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | Rob Wultsch | 11 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECTJOIN | Tristan Marly | 13 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECTJOIN | Sebastian Mendel | 14 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | tmarly | 15 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers,but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | Wm Mussatto | 15 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | Rob Wultsch | 15 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | tmarly | 16 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | Rob Wultsch | 16 Apr |
| • Re: Two MySql servers, but very different performances for a SELECT JOIN | tmarly | 16 Apr |