| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Chris | Date: | January 16 2008 6:27am |
| Subject: | Re: Does SQL_NO_CACHE work? | ||
| View as plain text | |||
mos wrote: > I tried : > > select SQL_NO_CACHE * from table where col1='abc'; > > which took 800ms the first time it was executed. The second time it was > executed it took 0ms. How is that possible if the query is not put into > the query cache? Should the query take roughly the same amount of time? Disk cache. The database table was still in memory. The OS caches a lot of stuff too (file descriptors etc). Try restarting mysql between runs and see if that's more consistent.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Does SQL_NO_CACHE work? | mos | 16 Jan |
| • Re: Does SQL_NO_CACHE work? | Chris | 16 Jan |
| • Re: Does SQL_NO_CACHE work? | Dan Nelson | 16 Jan |
| • Re: Does SQL_NO_CACHE work? | Moon's Father | 16 Jan |
