On 12.11.2007 22:16 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote:
> Since I only need these locks for
> a very short time and a single table with no transaction support, this
> works fine for me.
Damn, I found out that I need table locking *and* transactions. I'm lost...
Maybe I'm really better off using a sequence (like the one PostgreSQL
offers and like it is available as an add-on for Perl ). But then
again, I need queries outside of a transaction so that the sequence's
next number is immediately commited and visible to other users. I have
the impression that it all doesn't work.
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <nospam.list@stripped>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de