On 12.11.2007 20:43 CE(S)T, Yves Goergen wrote:
> I'll have a look at those isolation levels though. Maybe it's what I'm
> looking for.
Not quite. But I'm going the LOCK TABLES way now. Locking a single table
exclusively for those rare moments seems to be the best solution.
I could also implement an abstraction for that, because other DBMS have
different syntax to do the same thing. Since I only need these locks for
a very short time and a single table with no transaction support, this
works fine for me.
--
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <nospam.list@stripped>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de
