List:General Discussion« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Robert DiFalco Date:September 17 2007 9:22pm
Subject:Rollback on a Transaction with No Updates
View as plain text  
Is there any difference between calling rollback or commit on a
transaction that did not alter data? For example, not a read-only
transaction but a transaction that only performed read-only selects. Any
difference in performance between calling rollback or commit? I know
they are functionally the same at the high level. 

Thread
Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesRobert DiFalco17 Sep
  • Re: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesBaron Schwartz17 Sep
    • RE: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesRobert DiFalco17 Sep
      • Re: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesMichael Dykman17 Sep
        • RE: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesRobert DiFalco18 Sep
          • Re: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesMichael Dykman18 Sep
            • RE: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesRobert DiFalco18 Sep
    • Re: Rollback on a Transaction with No UpdatesBaron Schwartz19 Sep