| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Michael Dykman | Date: | August 15 2007 8:36pm |
| Subject: | Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | ||
| View as plain text | |||
> >Question 2: If not, what would the Insert/Select statement look like that > would copy the records over in sorted order? > > > Tables aren't sorted. Period. > > > > Only result-sets can be sorted. While that is true, strictly speaking, packing data into the same physical order as you expect to logically access it is a fairly common optimization for data which remains fairly static. Having said that, for the 1600 records reffered to here, I doubt there would be any observable difference. -- - michael dykman - mdykman@stripped - All models are wrong. Some models are useful.
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Recreate Table With Sorted Data | John Kebbel | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Wm Mussatto | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Martijn Tonies | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Dan Nelson | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Michael Dykman | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Martijn Tonies | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | John Kebbel | 15 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Martijn Tonies | 16 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | Chris Boget | 16 Aug |
| • Re: Recreate Table With Sorted Data | John Kebbel | 18 Aug |
