| List: | General Discussion | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Perrin Harkins | Date: | July 23 2007 5:52pm |
| Subject: | Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | ||
| View as plain text | |||
On 7/23/07, Sid Lane <jakes.dad@stripped> wrote: > is either one significantly faster than the other? Yes, LOAD DATA INFILE is much faster. > are there additional (faster) approaches I have not thought of? Not that I've found. I think you'd have to write directly to the C API to beat LOAD DATA INFILE. - Perrin
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • performance of extended insert vs. load data | Sid Lane | 23 Jul |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | Perrin Harkins | 23 Jul |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | mos | 23 Jul |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | Perrin Harkins | 23 Jul |
| • ordering dates | Ross Hulford | 12 Sep |
| • Re: ordering dates | Michael Dykman | 12 Sep |
| • Re: ordering dates | Philip Hallstrom | 12 Sep |
| • RE: ordering dates | Jerry Schwartz | 12 Sep |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | B. Keith Murphy | 23 Jul |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | Mogens Melander | 24 Jul |
| • Re: performance of extended insert vs. load data | Ravi Prasad | 24 Jul |