According to the manuel, Falcon is not yet optimized for performances,
so benchmarking it would not be fair.
And I do not recommand using the binary alpha release in production, you
could corrupt badly your database (some bugs has only been fixed a few
days ago concerning this corruption).
mos a écrit :
> At 03:54 PM 1/25/2007, you wrote:
>> > Another thing to consider is:
>> heh, silly mail client :). Another thing to consider is this:
>> Though it's "Not recommended for production use", I've heard people
>> still use
>> it in production environments.
> Falcon doesn't currently support RI. And like Innodb, it requires
> its own table space so it too may get fragmented.
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/falcon/en/se-falcon-createdb.html and will
> likely require packing (sweeping?) from time to time. It would be nice
> to see some benchmarks compared to InnoDb and MyISAM.